Democrat From Kentucky


Democrat from Kentucky
We promote fair and honest political discussion from all sides of the ideological spectrum While my own opinions and my contributors tend toward a more progressive view, that's not always the case. I ask people to comment freely and openly to promote fair discourse.
Top US stories
 


Previous Posts


A Glimpse into the Future of Ernie's Follies
Welcome aboard
Bill Moyer, 73, wears a "Bullshit Protector" flap ...
Pat Robertson: Certified RightWing Nutjob
The Price of Oil
Va. Senator Likens Iraq to Normandy?
GOP Lookin' For Work
How to keep your child from being a homosexual
Leaving Iraq Via Tehran Highway?
NYT Cindy Sheehan Editorial

Google


Bush and Saudi: Friends Forever Tuesday, August 23, 2005

I swiped this story from the Nation. A great progressive magazine. It covers a little bit of the background and current affairs with the Saudi government. Pay close attention. This only your future you're reading about.

Mortgaged to the House of Saud

Robert Scheer

The only evidence you need that President Bush is losing the "war on terror" is this: On Sunday, the foreign minister of Saudi Arabia said that relations with the United States "couldn't be better."

Tell that to the parents of those who have died in two wars defending this corrupt spawning ground of violent extremism. Never mind the ugly facts: We are deeply entwined with Saudi Arabia even though it shares none of our values and supports our enemies.

Yet on Friday, Bush's father and Vice President Dick Cheney made another in a long line of obsequious American pilgrimages to Riyadh to assure the Saudis that we continue to be grateful for the punishment they dish out.

The only evidence you need that President Bush is losing the "war on terror" is this: On Sunday, the foreign minister of Saudi Arabia said that relations with the United States "couldn't be better."

Tell that to the parents of those who have died in two wars defending this corrupt spawning ground of violent extremism. Never mind the ugly facts: We are deeply entwined with Saudi Arabia even though it shares none of our values and supports our enemies.

Yet on Friday, Bush's father and Vice President Dick Cheney made another in a long line of obsequious American pilgrimages to Riyadh to assure the Saudis that we continue to be grateful for the punishment they dish out.

"The relationship has tremendously improved with the United States," Saudi Foreign Minister Saud al Faisal told a news conference in Riyadh. "With the government, of course, it is very harmonious, as it ever was. Whether it has returned to the same level as it was before in terms of public opinion [in both countries], that is debatable."

Well, score one for public opinion. It makes sense to distrust the mercenary and distasteful alliance between the United States and Saudi Arabia. We protect the repressive kingdom that spawned Osama bin Laden, and most of the 9/11 hijackers, in exchange for the Saudis keeping our fecklessly oil-addicted country lubricated.

Yes, it has stuck deep in the craw of many of us Americans that after 9/11, Washington squandered global goodwill and a huge percentage of our resources invading a country that had nothing to do with Al Qaeda, while continuing to pander to this dysfunctional dynasty. After all, Saudi Arabia is believed to have paid bin Laden's murderous gang millions in protection money in the years before 9/11, and it lavishly funds extremist religious schools throughout the region that preach and teach anti-Western jihad.

"Al Qaeda found fertile fundraising ground in the kingdom," noted the 9/11 commission report in one of its many careful understatements. The fact is, without Saudi Arabia, there would be no Al Qaeda today.

Our President loves to use the word "evil" in his speeches, yet throughout his life he and his family have had deep personal, political and financial ties with a country that represents everything the American Revolution stood against: tyranny, religious intolerance, corrupt royalty and popular ignorance. This is a country where women aren't allowed to drive and those who show "too much skin" can be beaten in the street by officially sanctioned mobs of fanatics. A medieval land where newspapers routinely publish the most outlandish anti-Semitic rants. A place where executions are held in public, torture is the norm in prison and the most extreme and expansionist version of Islam is the state religion.

It's hard to see how Saddam Hussein's brutal and secular Iraq was worse than the brutal theocracy run by the House of Saud. Yet one nation we raze and the other we fete. Is it any wonder that much of the world sees the United States as the planet's biggest hypocrite?

As insider books by former White House terrorism advisor Richard Clarke, journalist Bob Woodward and others have recounted, punishing Saudi Arabia in any way for its long ideological and financial support of terrorism was not even on the table in the days after 9/11. Instead, within hours of the planes hitting the towers, the powerful neoconservatives in the White House rushed to use the tragedy as an excuse for a long-dreamed invasion of Iraq.

Meanwhile, after two wars to make the Middle East safe for the Saudis, wars that cost hundreds of billions of taxpayer dollars and thousands of American lives, the price of oil is soaring--up 42 percent from just a year ago. Good thing we just passed a pork-laden energy bill that will do little to nothing to ease our crushing--and rising--dependence on imported oil. Federal officials project that by 2025, the United States will have to import 68 percent of its oil to meet demand, up from 58 percent today.

There are those who argue that the best rationale for invading Iraq was to ease our dependence on Saudi Arabia's massive oil fields, which might allow for a more rational or moral relationship. Yet the dark irony is that with Iraq in chaos and its oil flow limited by insurgent attacks and a bungled reconstruction, Saudi Arabia is now more important to the United States than ever.

It's scary, but these gaping contradictions don't seem to trouble our President a whit.

As the drumbeat of devastating terrorist attacks in Baghdad, London and elsewhere continue, Bush prattles on--five times in a speech last Wednesday--about his pyrrhic victories in the "war on terror." This is a sorry rhetorical device that disguises the fact that the forces of Islamic fanaticism in Saudi Arabia and elsewhere in the world are stronger than ever.

Response

A very revealing article I think. It goes to show you people where the real loyalty of the the U.S. government and more specifically the neocons remain, even after 9/11. I know many followers of he is the Bush say people who don't are a bunch of pansies but they're going to destroy this country and we're going to lose our position of power in the world because we suck up to a government under the thumb of extreme Islamic leaders who claim our nation is the great satan. Gimme A Break and get with the program.


posted by Stithmeister @ 8:22 PM
 
1 Comments:

Links to this post:

<\$BlogBacklinkControl\$> <\$BlogBacklinkTitle\$> <\$BlogBacklinkDeleteIcon\$>
<\$BlogBacklinkSnippet\$>
posted by <\$BlogBacklinkAuthor\$> \@ <\$BlogBacklinkDateTime\$>

<\$BlogItemBacklinkCreate\$>

At 9:48 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...
Ok, a thought from a hillbilly - rural state, Appalachian hills. i know about feuds, the politics of powerful families fighting, being hidden from the sherrif by your kin, disappearing into areas the law just doesn't want to look for you.

Some number of fugitives in the United States remain uncaught for a longer-than-typical to long time. A very very few of them turn out to be Unibombers living in shacks hidden in the wilderness. Some have long runs under new identities by a combination of luck plus the fact that no one is looking for them very rigorously.

But for the most part, when there is a genuine and concerted effort to find a fugitive, and said fugitive remains unfound, it is because he's being hidden by supporters. The most logical and effective supporters, with the biggest interest and the smallest likelihood of a 'sell-out' are relatives.

Were i Osama bin Laden, the place i would have sought out as refuge would be Saudi Arabia. It's home, all the family's there, plenty of walled estates to live in, holy land of Mecca and Medina, civilized living, Fillipino servants, and best of all.......

The house of ibn Saud is too rocky on the throne to give up/attack the Sunni fundamentalists' poster boy for fighting the Great Satan, and the Americans are unwilling to look there for the very same reason.

These guys aren't full of the outlook of the modern Western world. They think in terms of "that old-time (medieval) religion" plus "our family/clan/tribe versus yours". And their downfall is that, when given a chance, they want to join that modern Western world - much to the dismay of their religious & secular leadership that wants to keep them 'old school' and dependant.

Americans, study the hillbillies that you so scorn. You couldn't do worse in understanding Middle Eastern politics by doing so than thinking that invading Iraq would make friends.

- Cynicus -
 

Post a Comment

<< Home


Name:
Location: Harrodsburg, Kentucky, United States

I'm currently working in the telecomm industry but one of my passions is still politics.



Weekly Poll


Drop Me A Line

Add to My Yahoo! Add to Google

Atom Site Feed





<

Kentucky Blogs



National Blogs



Kentucky News



National News



Powered by Blogger
Weblog Commenting and Trackback by HaloScan.com