We promote fair and honest political discussion from all sides of the ideological spectrum While my own opinions and my contributors tend toward a more progressive view, that's not always the case. I ask people to comment freely and openly to promote fair discourse.
Cynicus's Iran Comments
Gore Takes Aim At NSA Spying
Thoughts On Martin Luther King Jr
Security Council Has "Serious Concerns" Over Iran'...
Bob Ney Steps Down As Chair of Admin Committee
Poll Shows Delay Dropping In His District
Heading Out of Iraq Via Tehran Highway
Republicans Trying To Shoot Down the Murtha Marine...
Open Topic For the Weekend
Governor On Newsmakers This Morning
Cynicus pointed this story out earlier today. The website, Soldiers for the Truth, ran a couple of articles in their online magazine DefenseWatch.
The first article mentions problems with soldiers and their body armor. The body armor in question is called Dragon Skin from a company called Pinnacle. The writers at the site have been talking to soldiers getting ready to deploy:
Two deploying soldiers and a concerned mother reported Friday afternoon that the U.S. Army appears to be singling out soldiers who have purchased Pinnacle's Dragon Skin Body Armor for special treatment. The soldiers, who are currently staging for combat operations from a secret location, reported that their commander told them if they were wearing Pinnacle Dragon Skin and were killed their beneficiaries might not receive the death benefits from their $400,000 SGLI life insurance policies. The soldiers were ordered to leave their privately purchased body armor at home or face the possibility of both losing their life insurance benefit and facing disciplinary action.
Now... the armor in question runs about $6000. The soldiers and their families paid for the stuff themselves yet they were told they couldn't wear it. They had to leave it at home. What was one of the major problems early on in the war? It was lack of protection. Now, we look at the fact that 9 top brass in Afghanistan who're "testing" the body armor. The argument being since it's not "officially approved" body armor, then it's not to be used.
So, the soldiers and their families fork out hard earned money for body armor that's at least as good as what they're getting off the plane. What am I referring too. Well, a recent Marine internal document surfaced on this article on the site as well suggesting the standard issue Interceptor OTV body armor ain't so great.
A recent United States Marine Corps forensic study obtained by DefenseWatch slams the Interceptor OTV body armor system, claiming "as many as 42% of the Marine casualties who died from isolated torso injuries could have been prevented with improved protection in the areas surrounding the plated areas of the vest. Nearly 23% might have benefited from protection along the mid-axillary line of the lateral chest. Another 15% died from impacts through the unprotected shoulder and upper arm," the report says.
Let's sum up. The U.S. military isn't letting soldiers use armor they chose to purchase with their money. The U.S. military also says the current armor isn't doing the job. They're saying that improved quality armor would probably have prevented a lot of marine deaths. As Cynicus suggested, "Although the Army and Marines have authorized soldiers to purchase their own body armor, apparently it is a violation of regs to use a brand that hasn't paid their kickbacks - even when it's one that the flag-rank brass is choosing for themselves."
Technorati Tags: Iraq War, Marine, Army, Defense Dept.,
posted by Stithmeister @ 8:11 PM
Post a Comment
links to this post << Home
I'm currently working in the telecomm industry but one of my passions is still politics.
Atom Site Feed
Ky Democratic Party
Air AMerica Radio
Ky. Stonewall Democrats
Long Way Home
Rick Howell Speaks
The Daou Report
New York Times
Christian Science Monitor
Los Angeles Times