Previous Posts
Fox NEws Gaining Credibility?
Rough Week For Bill O'Reilly Fletcher's Wounds Self Inflicted Pro War Rally In DC Open Topic Bill O'Reilly Vs. Phil Donahue Democrats Without Stones BIll O'Reilly Calls Tom DeLay Powerless BIll Maher's Commentary on the state of Bush in Am... Tejano Warriors: Johnson And Bush |
I was contemplating things today as I often do and it occurred to me the Democrats are suckers for wedge issues. In the 2004 election John Kerry had some good ideas. One thing he mentioned during the convention was commenting on OPECs ability to manipulate the U.S. economy. A great wedge issue that could've earned some great traction. The problem is they can never get their wedges to pick up traction yet the Republicans almost always are quick to identify and either plug or squash those issues.
Case in point is Ohio. The Democrats were doing quite well on Ohio, despite the strong Republican presence upto and include Bob Taft. The jobless rate is up, the war in Iraq is going on and things are looking good for the president. Then someone whispers QUEERS WANNA GET MARRIED and all hell breaks loose. "Damn those queers don't need to get married" or "them queers is gonna take us all to hell." The whole place sounds like the Westboro Baptist Church, Topeka, KS. It's insane. Then groups of people who'd never voted before, in 200 years of statehood voted in the election because George Bush is against queers/fags/lesbians etc. The liberals get ticked off because how dare anyone use religion to dictate terms on who should be able to get married and then how could anyone who's a Christian be a Democrat? The Democrats get suckered into this arguements and it's absolutely ridiculous because we get eaten alive on them. In all honesty, Democrats need to try and avoid these hotbutton issues. Stay away from them for the moment. Concentrate on issues people understand, like gas prices and jobless rates. Talk about the national deficit. Ask why people in New Orleans died and why does the mouthpieces of the GOP spin it in another direction? The Iraqi war we have to be careful with because no one wants to be seen as being disloyal and not supporting the soldier but at the same time, Cindy Sheehan has the a voice and others like her should continue to hammer the administration because it's tough to argue against a mother who's son was killed. If we keep on these issues, I think the Dems can do better, it's just a matter of hitting the other side in the jimmy and keeping them reeling. It's tough but it's possible. posted by Stithmeister @ 6:46 PM 2 Comments: Links to this post:
This is a point that needs to be hammered in over and over and over until it sticks. When a republican tries to get Democrats to talk about gays, abortion, etc. we need to argue that those are not the important issues we need to be discussing. We need to talk about the economy, health care concerns, gas prices, whatever. But we can't let Republicans define "important" issues for us.
Everyone read George Lakoff's book "Don't think of an Elephant". It's about framing - or watch his DVD. It's fantastic. Links to this post:
Read the article and agree fully. When I started Reading Huffington, I found too many of their 'Tag Lines' for the articles too strident.(Oddly enough, just like certain Hard-Core Conservative sites). However, it seems that this the US has become a 'Scream-ocracy'. Whoever screams loudest gets listened to. And we know that the News Media has become nothing but Sound-Bites for the Short Attention span crowd.(i.e. 90% of America)
But to the point. The Democrats seem lost. Kerry becomes less useful by the day (and thats saying something). Clinton (Bill that is) has decided 'f*ck it'. I can't imagine what they've offered him, but he & Bush Sr. wander around like gay lovers, hand in hand these days. Hillary (The other Clinton) could best serve by starting to be a strident Bush-ite. So many Republicans hate her that they'd turn on Jesus if she started supporting him. I begin to think that the Repug's have offered to run a wiffle candidate next time and let Hillary win (IF thats IS Possible, I think Howard the Duck could beat her in truth). I can't think of any Dim-ocrat currently talking of running that has any real platform different from the Repugs. Hell, Nader is almost begining to look better. But I'd still vote for Howard the Duck. He at least respects his cigars to much to waste it on an Intern. Post a Comment << Home |
About Me
I'm currently working in the telecomm industry but one of my passions is still politics. Weekly PollAtom Site Feed <
Ky Democratic Party MoveOn.Org Democratic Party Kentucky Dems Air AMerica Radio DemocraticUnderground Ky. Stonewall Democrats American Progress Media Matters BooneCntyDems Kentucky Blogs
BluegrassDemocrats Long Way Home Bluegrass Report Bluegrass Roots KyKurmudgeon Democratic State Kentucky Democrat The Bridge WireCan National Blogs
Arriana Huffington Eschaton DailyKos Talking Points CrooksandLiars MyDD Rick Howell Speaks The Daou Report Steve Gilliard Jesus General Attytude TPMCafe majikthise The Hotline IdealisticPragmastic Battle Panda AmericaBlog Kentucky News
Courier Journal Lexington Herald-Leader Messenger Enquirer WEKU Ky. Enquirer WHAS-11 WLEX-18 WKYT-27 WTVQ-36 WLKY-32 WAVE-3 GlasgowDailyTimes National News
New York Times Washington Post Christian Science Monitor NPR CNN NewsUnfiltered Los Angeles Times ABC News CBS News Newsweek |
posted by <\$BlogBacklinkAuthor\$> \@ <\$BlogBacklinkDateTime\$>